It’s! So! Super!

A while back I talked about All-Star Superman and why I thought the first 8 issues or so weren’t as great as they were cracked up to be. Several folks argued that I’d be more impressed if I finished the series.

So I just reread issues 1 to 12 and…eh. It’s not terrible or anything, certainly. I appreciated Frank Quitely’s art more this time around than I have in the past. The series has a nice, bright, striking color palette, and I like the clarity of the linework and layout; there’s a touch of Winsor McCay there, I think. I still find his figure drawings and faces off-putting; his women in particular often look like uncomfortably slender fetish mannequins, and facial expressions seem rubbery and oddly unexpressive. But as far as mainstream art these days go, this is about as good as it gets, I think.

The story is fine too…Morrison keeps things humming along; there’s no shortage of nutsy throwaway ideas — using a gravity gun to warp time; descendents of dinosaurs living underneath the earth; Jimmy Olsen dressing in Kryptonian garb for a lark; underworlds, overworlds, shrunken super-doctors — it’s all good. And, of course, there’s Superman’s approaching cell-death hanging over the series, giving it weight and pathos.

Except…man, how much do I care about these folks at all? Jimmy Olsen for example; he’s hip, he’s incredibly resourceful, he’s got this sixth sense which warns him of danger, he’s got his signal watch — he’s just so cool! And, well, irritating. Same with the endlessly chattering Lois who won’t believe Clark is Superman; or with Superman himself, always rushing off to save someone or other, constantly forgiving everybody; or with, say, Lex’s gratuitously fetish-goth-garbed niece. Everything’s just. So. Awesome! and. Inventive! and Cool! “No one but me can save the world Lois! My cells are converting to pure energy, pure information. And I only have moments to save the world.” Tum ta tum! You feel like you need to utter a little inspirational horn bleat after every panel; it’s all characters making preposterously pompous little speeches and the racing off to be heroic. Everything feels like it’s at maximum volume.

Morrison’s always written like that. In stuff like Doom Patrol or even the Filth, I always felt it was thrown off tongue in cheek; making fun of the immensity of super-hero stuff, and often undercutting it with pratfalls or ridiculousness (like the silly Brotherhood of Dada, for example.) But as he’s moved into more mainstreamy work, that deflation has gotten lost. And…it’s not that he’s not clever. It’s not that he doesn’t have good ideas. It’s not even that there aren’t touching moments. I just hate the feeling that he’s tapping me on the shoulder every page yelling in my ear, “This is soooo great! This is Superman, booooy! Go! Go! Go!”

I’ve said this before, but…it totally vitiates everything that’s best about Silver-Age storytelling when you try to tell a story capturing the brilliant innocence of silver-age storytelling. Because a lot of what was fun in those Silver-Age stories was that they were really off-hand and not at all pretentious. Sure, a Silver Age story might have Bizarro in one panel and evolved dinosaurs in the next and then an intelligent sun on the next page…but that would just be the story. There wouldn’t be the winking about, wow, this is so cool. I felt like Alan Moore handled it better in “Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow” by slowing the pacing down and being somewhat more bloody minded; trying to think how the silver age stuff might work out if you looked at it from an older perspective. It was an homage to the era, not an attempt to recreate it. Morrison though seems to be trying to go back in time through sheer puffery and volume and frantic pacing. And I think it’s significant that Moore’s message was that the world doesn’t need Superman (which is, as it happens, true), whereas Morrison’s message is that we do need Superman watching over us forever, at least as a kind of beautiful ideal. Which is basic fanboy aggrandizement — and also not true, even if you bellow it.

Also, the end? I really thought, from all the foreshadowing and what people had said about the series that, you know, he dies. But he doesn’t quite. They still think he might come back. It just seems…I don’t know. It seems kind of lame, really, with all the build up.

Again, I didn’t hate the book. It’s entertaining. There are a lot of wonderful moments (Clark Kent bumbling around while interviewing Lex Luther is lovely; reminded me of the Chris Reeves Superman movie, which I still think was pretty great.) And of course, it’s hard to resist Luthor’s eyes checking out the superpackage:

Photobucket

I know everybody goes on about the freshness of the series, the way it rejuvenated the character, and on and on. But it feels really decadent to me; definitely part of the zeitgeist, rather than an answer or alternative to it. I’d way, way, way rather read this than Marvel Zombies…but I don’t necessarily think they’re different in kind.

0 thoughts on “It’s! So! Super!

  1. My 2 cents:

    I read the first issue, maybe the second, and then let it drop. No clearcut objections to it, just a sense that life must be very dull if people can get excited about this series.

  2. I did get excited about the book, because solid/entertaining/genuinely clever is so far beyond the meager thrills almost anyone else is squeezing out of superhero books anymore–but I took the book as more of a summing up and inevitable closing of doors, a la Dark Knight Returns. Grant loves the character so much he single-handedly renders any further stories about him moot–a service he then went on to perform for the entire DC Universe in Final Crisis.

    Looking back, I’m amazed that Morrison dazzled me with the pyrotechnics of the thing so much (my adored pet theory that Quintum is the redeemed future version of Luthor as a primary example) that I failed to fully appreciate how the series indulged in one of my least favorite aspects of post-1960s Superman comics, namely the self-conscious hyper-aggrandizement of Superman as Noble Heroic Ideal Sun God. So many writers of widely varying ability have been crushed under the heel of corporate’s or their own misguided need to Tell not Show that the character is THEBESTINALLOFUSOHMYGOD.

    Now, Morrison told that story better than anyone ever has, and I genuinely love All-Star Superman. It was an effective sermon to the choir. But the underlying message is still auto-fellatio compared to Jerry Siegel’s idea of a smug prick left-wing populist demigod from space who lives to stick his circus boot through the ass of a crooked mine owner, war profiteer or the wife beater next door. But like Wonder Woman, Superman is pinned by his own artificial legend as something far more than he actually is. The one-off success of A-SS aside, the problem with boring Superman stories isn’t that he’s “too powerful” like all the kids say, it’s that he has been written as True North of Goodness Immortal American Myth since the early 1970s, a desperate justification in the face of diminishing relevancy and sinking sales and a terrible engine for getting anyone to give a shit.

  3. Okay, Tom, Cole, I’m a tolerant guy, but it’s time for you all to STOP WRITING COMMENTS THAT ARE BETTER THAN MY POST!

    Okay? Okay.

  4. Wow, Cole. That pretty much nailed exactly how I feel about All Star Superman without me even realizing that’s Exactly How I Felt About All Star Superman.

  5. “And I think it’s significant that Moore’s message was that the world doesn’t need Superman (which is, as it happens, true), whereas Morrison’s message is that we do need Superman watching over us forever, at least as a kind of beautiful ideal. Which is basic fanboy aggrandizement — and also not true, even if you bellow it.”

    -flips on CNN-

    How is Moore right, exactly?

    You’re also misinterpreting Morrison. Morrison has, at least since JLA, posited Superman as a moral model, not Big Brother. I’m not very big on Richard Reynolds-esque over mythologizing of superhero comics, but Morrison makes it work with Superman

  6. AS Superman (oh sh*t – Asperger’s Superman?) was fun. Substantial? No. Well written? Kind of. But super mega fun.

    I liked “I can kill everyone” olden day Superman.

  7. Anon, I’m saying Supes as moral model is dumb. Also, it’s not clear exactly how he’d solve our economic crisis. Go back in time and force Nixon not to go off the gold standard, maybe?

    Brian, I think the technical term for that is “superman is a dick era.”

  8. Superman would solve the economic crisis by throwing all the fat cat bankers into the ocean. Duh.

    Also, there’s no way Superman is a gold standard guy. Maybe silver.

  9. “Superman would solve the economic crisis by throwing all the fat cat bankers into the ocean. Duh.”

    It would all turn out to be a secret plot by Luther. JUST LIKE REAL LIFE!!!!!!!!!

  10. go back in time and force Nixon not to go off the gold standard, maybe?

    Ron Paul is Clark Kent?