if the hood fits, utilize it

So I’m past overdue for an introductory post (and overdue for an actual-content post, but I’ll worry about that later). My name is Miriam Libicki (the beetle part is an old nickname that follows me around Blogger). I write and draw autobiographical comics based on my experiences as the worst secretary in the Israeli army, as well as other short nonfiction pieces that you may or may not call comics, if you’re some sort of a definition-hugger. Here is a link to my most popular, I think, definitely my most controversial piece, marking the first time I got called an anti-Semite on the internet.*

I come out of a hippie-feminist background, an Orthodox-Jewish background, and a wannabe-intellectual-art-school background all at once, so that might give you a bit of an idea of things I’ll posting about. I have never written for the Comics Journal. I’m a self-publisher who works the con circuit (I exhibited at at least a dozen comicons this year, and my schedule for next year is already filling up), so I may do some self-promotion, but I’ll try to keep it tasteful. I also may badmouth the comics of some people I’ll have to apologize to later at a show, and that could be entertaining for everyone.

What I read mostly these days are North American alternative/”literary” type comics. I have ingrained prejudices against manga, but I asked for Nanas vol. 1 and 2 for Winter Holiday**. We will see if I like them, or if I get quickly divested of my utilitarianhood. And finally, I will introduce myself, following Tom, by explaining how reading superhero comics as a child screwed me up for life.

I think the worst lesson I learned from growing up on Marvel comics is not that women are sex objects, but that women can dress in lingerie and not be sexualized by those around them. No one talks down to them, talks to their chests, tries to grope them, or makes winking insinuations (or if they did, in the eighties, it went over my head). Ororo could be a tough, smart team leader in a leather onesie with cut-outs.

This made me want to dress up everywhere in lingerie or bondage gear*** (cause it’s pretty!), and be treated the same as a man. I was cruelly acquainted with reality at age fourteen or so, but aesthetic preferences are a hard thing to shake.

Which leads inevitably to getting in fights with my mother over clothes every week during high school, despite being an introvert who never dated, to nobody believing I was religious when I lived in Israel, to being my own conflicted booth babe at comicons across the nation (see below for my favourite pictorial depiction of same).

* for the record, I did not write the little introductory blurb at the link, just the actual pages.
** I’m Jewish, my in-laws are Christmas-loving Buddhists. It’s a bit complicated, but working out ok so far.
*** yes, our favourite comics were Chris Claremont-penned X-men and New Mutants.

More Facts


  • William Shatner played Alexander the Great in a pilot that co-starred Adam West and John Cassavetes.
  • Yul Brinner would literally kick Shatner in the ass in between scenes when they were filming The Brothers Karamazov.
  • A photo caption in Shatner’s autobiography misspells his daughter’s name.
(From Up Till Now: The Autobiography by William Shatner with David Fisher)

Euroscraps

A couple things turned up while researching a couple quick articles on Finnish cartoonists, nice to be reminded of if nothing else:

Some images by Stefano Ricci

Comicstills, rather than Rube Goldberg’s moon-running, offers images from a few dozen Euro alt-artists. It’s an illustration agency– that is, an chance to sample fine drawings by some top artists hard to find for 0 Euros. Stefano Ricci, Marko Turunen, Anke Feuchtenberger.

And Electrocomix, with a few dozen free PDF files by some fine cartoonists. Many of their offerings sample from anthologies like Canicola, featuring great new talents like Amanda Vähämäki and Michaelangelo Setola. From Glömp #9 there’s Olivier Schrauwen’s metal-barbarian rout “The Trap,” and three good stories by Hong Kong’s Chihoi. And Ulli Lust, so exuberant for the onset of spring, not safe for church, but please donate a Euro-fifty on your way out the döör.

A page by Chihoi

Fact

Rod Serling’s father wanted to invent a hot dog shaped like a hamburger.

(From Rod Serling: Dreams and Nightmares of Life in the Twilight Zone by Joel Engel)

Children of Hurin

This is a short review of J.R.R. Tolkein’s posthumous novel, Children of Hurin. It was first published in the Chicago Reader.

Villains in fantasy novels often seem like stage props: all pro forma cackling and black outerwear. Whatever the failings of his imitators, though, genre-founder J.R.R. Tolkein always got evil right. In “Children of Hurin”— a posthumous text sewn together from manuscript sources — there is, of course, a standard-issue fell sorceror. Tolkein, though, knows that mysterious is more menacing; Morgoth appears in person only briefly to cast a curse on the protagonist, Túrin.

It is the curse itself which is the real villain — and that curse seems almost indistinguishable from simple human weakness. Túrin is brave, honorable, and generous — but at the same time he is short-sighted, selfish, and, especially, proud. His failings make him, as Glaurung the Dragon says, “treacherous to foes, faithless to friends, a curse unto his kin….” Even his love — for friends, mother, wife, and sister— leads him to violence and despair.

For Catholics like Tolkein, of course, sin is both an external doom and an internal failing: Turin and his sister are destroyed because Glaurung deceives them, but also because they choose to listen to him. Evil is a real cosmic force, but its power comes from the corruption in the human heart. In “The Lord of the Rings,” that corruption yields to courage, to faith, and to love. “Children of Hurin” is a bleaker book, but not a worse one,

Suzanne Vega

Like the others I’ve been posting, this review ran in Bitch back in 2007.

Suzanne Vega
Beauty and Crime
Blue Note

Tegan and Sara, Catpower, Joanna Newsome, Mirah —intelligent, heartfelt tweeness is as hip as its ever been. This is good news for Suzanne Vega, who, on her new album, comes across as oh-so-2007 without updating her sound at all. You expect well-crafted, shimmery pop from a Suzanne Vega album, and that’s what you get.

Which isn’t to say that the album is boring or monotonous. Vega doesn’t stray far from her formula, but she varies things enough to hold your attention. Her lyrical concerns range from dreamy nostalgia (“Ludlow Street”), to dreamy romance (“Bound”), to dreamy politics (“Angel’s Doorway”), to all three at once (“Pornographer’s Dream”). And she manages to be musically eclectic in a quiet way that’s thoroughly charming. You might miss it the first time through, but“Zephyr Street” takes its riff from “Smells Like Teen Spirit”; “Pornographer’s Dream” is bossa nova, “Unbound” is edges towards a club beat. .

My favorite song, though, is “As You Are Now.” Vega’s vocals are less mannered, and the production is a bit more polished, but otherwise it sounds like it could have come off her debut. Moreover, there’s none of the precious urbanity that mars some of her other tracks: no clunky references to Edith Wharton or Frank Sinatra or the World Trade Center, thank you very much. “As You Are Now” is a straightforward love poem. It’s still precious, of course (it’s Suzanne Vega, after all), but in a good way. “I will treasure all your teeth/your laughter and the pearls beneath/keep them in a cardboard box/through the tickings and the tocks.” Time’s hasn’t taken Vega anywhere, but it’s nice to think that the rest of us have caught up with her again.

Not Every Stone is Rollin’: Not Every Folk’s a Freak
Here Comes the New Boss: Same As The Old Waif

The Fogeys are All Right

A version of this review of Merle Haggard’s The Bluegrass Sessions ran in the Chicago Reader earlier this year.

Of the extant viable American pop genres, country music is the most obsessively conservative. Not that it’s completely static, of course — Gretchen Wilson doesn’t sound much like classic Wanda Jackson, who sounded even less like Sara Carter. But country’s innovations always have to be justified or explained by pointing backwards, and, as such, the turnover in sound, and, especially, in marketing tends to be a lot slower than on other parts of the radio dial. Gretchen Wilson does, after all, sound a fair bit like Tanya Tucker.

Country’s obsession with an authentic rural past has often been the occasion for scorn — perhaps most effectively in Richard A. Peterson’s acid 1997 tome, “Creating Country Music.” And the mythologizing has undeniably had numerous bad effects. For one, though ‘30s and ‘40s country artists were able to assimilate jazz and blues, swallowing later musics has been increasingly difficult, which is part of the reason that country radio these days is so aesthetically bankrupt. Similarly, country’s humiliating paucity of black performers has everything to do with its fetishization of its own roots in an era of virulent segregation and racism.

Still, there’s an up side as well: namely, aging country stars aren’t contractually obligated to engage in extended acts of self-parody. Rock, pop, and rap stars are all about being cutting edge, dangerous, and rebellious in various combinations. That looks great when you’re in your twenties. Once you hit forty, or fifty, or seventy, though, you start to look like — well, like late Elvis Presley. Or Paul McCartney. Or Sting, or Michael Jackson…or, day I say, Madonna or Bob Dylan. All of these folks still make bucket-loads of money, of course,. But the cost, to them and their fans, is that they end up looking like greedy, tottering fools, the butt of the very jokes they would have told back when they were young and smart and talented and didn’t suck.

For country stars, getting old certainly presents cash flow problems. But it doesn’t create an identity quandary. Country doesn’t have an ideology of generational warfare, so its heroes have a lot more options when they start to go grey. They can, for example, dump the radio hits and head for bluegrass, as Ricky Skaggs or (somewhat later in her career) Dolly Parton did. Or they can go for higher gloss production and slip into New Age, like Emmylou Harris. Or they can hang out with the rock kids, like Loretta Lynn and Johnny Cash. Not all of these choices result in great music. But neither are they embarrassing repudiations of the artists’ entire raison d’etre. Willie Nelson can make a bum album or two, but I’d still love to see him live. The Rolling Stones, not so much.

Of all the country greats, Merle Haggard is probably the one whose persona has aged most seamlessly. Haggard didn’t even release his first single until he was 27, but even then he had the attitude and fire of an especially cantankerous septuagenarian. Artists like Rod Stewart or Eric Clapton may put off the homages until their careers are in decline, but Hag had barely planted his feet before he started in with the roots explorations : a Jimmie Rodgers tribute in 1969, a Bob Wills one in 1970, even a tribute to little-known blackface performer Emmet Miller in 1973. So when in 2001 Haggard released *Roots*, celebrating classic honky-tonkers like Lefty Frizzell, or when he put out a standards collection (*Unforgettable*) in 2004, it didn’t seem like he was retrenching — just doing what he’d always done.

The same could be said of his latest album, “The Bluegrass Sessions,” which was recorded, naturally enough, on Del McCoury’s label. Admittedly, bluegrass has never been one of Haggard’s primary influences — he’s always worked in the more urbane styles of honky-tonk, and the California Bakersfield sound. Still, as this album demonstrates, those traditions have many of the same forefathers, from the famous Jimmie Rodgers to the less well known Delmore Brothers. As it happens, Haggard cannily includes covers of both of these performers. On “Jimmie Rodgers Blues,” he interjects Bob Willsesque asides between the bluegrass solos, and it works perfectly — as well it might, given the debt that both bluegrass and western swing owe to early jazz. Similarly, on the Delmore Brothers’“Blues Stay Away From Me,” Haggard’s plaintive, almost-yodel points towards the keening of Bill Monroe, while the crack band (led by Marty Stuart), plays low-down blues as if they’ve been doing it all their lives. Which, of course, they more or less have.

Neither do tunes from Haggard’s back catalogue suffer in their new setting.
“Big City,” a 1981 track about escaping urban life, actually makes more sense with a smaller, more rustic-sounding acoustic band. Haggard’s voice has aged, and he no longer has the unerring control that was once his trademark. But he’s learned a trick or two from Willie Nelson, and uses the new waver in his singing to project vulnerability and emotion. His phrasing is smart and affecting, as always, and lonesome harmony vocals by Alison Krauss (on “Mama’s Hungry Eyes”) and guitarist Carl Jackson (everywhere else) fit snugly over his lead.

Still, this can’t be said to be one of Haggard’s best albums. Revisiting one of his old gems would have been nice; four, though, starts to seem lazy. The limited instrumentation also becomes a bit monotonous — by the end I was missing the occasional horns which enliven many of his sets. And, perhaps most importantly, his new songs here generally lack the bite of his best work. “Pray,” and “Momma’s Prayers” are, as the titles suggest, maudlin and moralistic — a strain always present in Haggard’s work, but not one I like to see overplayed.

“What Happened?” though, is the low point, with Haggard rotely complaining about high taxes, high gas prices, and the country generally going to hell. Again, one can’t blame this on Haggard’s getting crotchety in his old age— he’s been bitching about those darn kids for forty years now. But his classic songs in this vein, like 1969’s famous “Okie From Muskogee,” use humor and specific details to open the song up to audiences of all philosophical persuasions. “What Happened?” lacks that depth, substituting an irritating querelousness that reminds me of Lou Reed’s lesser work.

But just because this isn’t Haggard’s high point doesn’t mean the next one won’t be. His albums have always varied in quality, and he’s done some spectacular work in the oughts: *If I Could Only Fly,* from 2000, is probably one of his two or three greatest ever. And even his lesser efforts have their virtues. Like, for example, the one great new song here, “Learning to Live With Myself,” a weary reflection on aging and loss. “It’s hard to face up to the mirror/Leave all the habits on the shelf/Till he gives me my call/The hardest of all/Will be learning to live with myself.” Keeping up an identity can be a bore and a burden–especially when your identity is that of a pop singer. But, whatever his worries, Haggard wears his skin more comfortably than just about anyone else in the business.